‘Patient L’ is a man in a vegetative state, under the care of Pennine Acute Hospitals Trust. The Trust has placed a Do Not Rescuscitate order in his notes, yet his family claim that he himself would want to be revived if his condition deteriorated, because of his faith in Islam. The court of protection has now decided in favour of the Trust.
The Trust’s claim is that it is in Patient L’s best interests to be allowed to die, whereas Patient L himself – if we are to believe his family (and there seems little reason not to) – would almost certainly disagree. Continue reading →
- Kyle Edwards on How the Danziger Story Advances the Abortion Debate in America: Actual Futures, Moral Status, and Common Ground
- - on A minimal proceduralist argument against Crimean independence
- Andreas Kappes on Page 3 untainted?
- Nadira Faulmueller on Page 3 untainted?
- Amelia on Another Surprising Side-Effect of Paracetamol: Causing ADHD?