conflict of interest
Medical ethics are ridiculous
In a blistering letter in the current issue of the British Medical Journal, Miran Epstein identifies some of the factors we should consider in assessing the claims of so-called ‘evidence-based medicine’.[1] Nobody rationally disagrees with the suggestion that medicine should have an evidence base, and everybody should agree that in order for medicine to be based on reliable evidence, it should be free of the following ‘polluters’:
- financial conflicts of interest
- inadequately rigorous selection criteria, outcome measures and criteria of statistical significance
- the practice of testing products against placebo or no treatment (rather than current treatment), and then shouting ‘Eureka!’
- recruiting subjects using financial incentives that introduce outcome bias
- marketing campaigns masquerading as research
- research agendas driven by corporate interests rather than patient needs Continue reading →
Recent Posts
- Should Parents be Able to Decline Consent for Brain Death Testing in a Child?
- Archie Battersbee: How the Court Reached its Conclusion
- Cross Post: Is Google’s LaMDA conscious? A philosopher’s view
- Healthcare Ethics Has a Gap…
- Can a Character in an Autobiographical Novel Review the Book in Which She Appears? On the Ethics of Literary Criticism
Popular posts
- If you’re a Conservative, I’m not your friend
- Oxford Uehiro Prize in Practical Ethics: When is Sex With Conjoined Twins Permissible?
- What if schizophrenics really are possessed by demons, after all?
- Archie Battersbee: How the Court Reached its Conclusion
- Archie Battersbee: How the Court Reached its Conclusion
Recent Comments