Social norms
Pandemic Ethics: the Unilateralist Curse and Covid-19, or Why You Should Stay Home
by Anders Sandberg
In Scientific American Zeynep Tufekci writes:
Preparing for the almost inevitable global spread of this virus, … , is one of the most pro-social, altruistic things you can do in response to potential disruptions of this kind.
We should prepare, not because we may feel personally at risk, but so that we can help lessen the risk for everyone.
…you should prepare because your neighbors need you to prepare—especially your elderly neighbors, your neighbors who work at hospitals, your neighbors with chronic illnesses, and your neighbors who may not have the means or the time to prepare because of lack of resources or time.
I think this is well put. As a healthy middle-aged academic my personal risk of dying from Covid-19 seems modest – maybe about 0.4% if I get it, which in turn might be below 10% depending on how widespread the virus becomes. But I could easily spread the disease to people who are far more vulnerable, either directly or indirectly. Even slowing the spread is valuable since it helps avoid overloading the medical system at the peak of the epidemic. Continue reading →
Cross Post: How psychology can help us solve climate change
Written by Rachel New, researcher University of Oxford,
and Nadira Faber, Research Fellow University of Oxford.
This article was originally published by The Conversation
The Paris agreement on climate change calls for a global responsibility to cooperate. As we are often reminded, we urgently and drastically need to limit our use of one shared resource – fossil fuels – and its effect on another – the climate. But how realistic is this goal, both for national leaders and for us? Well, psychology may hold some answers.
Psychologists and economists have long explored the conflict between short-term individual and long-term collective interests when dealing with shared resources. Think of the commons dilemma: the scenario in which a field for grazing cattle works well when everyone cooperates by sticking to one cow each, but which leads to the so-called “tragedy of the commons” if more selfish drives take over.
It is useful to think about overuse of fossil fuels and its effect on the climate as a similar dilemma. If we were to think of this from a purely economic perspective, we would likely act selfishly. But psychological research should make us more optimistic about cooperation. Continue reading →
Recent Posts
Popular posts
- What if schizophrenics really are possessed by demons, after all?
- If you’re a Conservative, I’m not your friend
- Oxford Uehiro Prize in Practical Ethics: When is Sex With Conjoined Twins Permissible?
- 7 reasons not to feel bad about yourself when you have acted immorally
- Rethinking ‘Higher’ and ‘Lower’ Pleasures
Recent Comments