Practical Ethics
Playing God for the first time…
With his new paper Craig Venter is creaking open the most profound door in humanity’s history, potentially peeking into it’s destiny. The challenge is to eat the apple without choking on the worm.
The carnival is coming…
Practical Ethics News will host the 109th Philosophers' Carnival on 7th June. If you know of a particularly good (recent) philosophy blog post, you can nominate it for inclusion via this link. Posts need not be on the topic of practical ethics, although they should be accessible to a popular audience. Posts relating to current… Read More »The carnival is coming…
Comments on Practicalethicsnews
Practicalethicsnews is now 2 1/2 years old, and continues to grow. We are keen to improve this blog further, and are going to make a few changes in coming weeks. One change that we are trialling is an alteration to our comments policy. We are keen to encourage readers of our blog, including those who… Read More »Comments on Practicalethicsnews
Comments policy
We encourage readers of our blog, including those who do not have a background in philosophy or ethics, to respond to posts and to engage in debate with our authors, and with each other. Comments should be polite, concise and relevant to the topic. Authors will respond to comments where possible, though may not respond… Read More »Comments policy
How to Prescribe Smart Drugs to Children Ethically
Ilina Singh and colleagues argue that the use of drugs such as Ritalin among young people is becoming so common that family doctors should be able to prescribe them as study aids to school pupils aged under 18.(1)
While the Guardian article rather cherry-picks from the range of Singh’s arguments in her original article, I have made broadly similar arguments to those in the Guardian article supporting cognitive enhancement myself (see here for a selection on enhancement).
However, one might ask whether the prescription of enhancement for young children who are incapable of consenting for themselves raises unique issues.
Read More »How to Prescribe Smart Drugs to Children Ethically
George and the British election
Politics is the art of compromise, but rarely has compromise been so necessary a political virtue in Britain as it is today.
Very soon we’ll know who’s done a deal with whom. The Liberal Democrats are the king-makers: ultimately they’ll decide whether to prop up a Tory or a Labour-led government. Let us be exceptionally generous and take the politicians at their word: let’s assume that what’s currently weighing on their minds is not personal interest, or party interest, but national interest. They may disagree about what constitutes the national interest, and how it is best achieved, but they agree that it’s what really matters.
Political and moral theory has a lot to say about compromise. And one character it’s worth remembering is George.
Embrace the controversy: let’s offer Project Prevention on the NHS
A controversial US-based charity that pays drug addicts to undergo sterilisation or long-term contraception has recently opened for business in the UK. Project Prevention pays drug users $300 if they provide a medical certificate of drug dependency and another certifying that they have had tubal ligation, vasectomy or a contraceptive implant. The founder of the charity points to the significant physical and psychological problems in children born to drug-using parents. Noone would deny that it would be good to avoid these problems. Drug counselling often includes advice about contraception, and encouragement of those who are interested to take up options including long term contraception or sterilisation – we don’t think that that is a particular problem. So what is wrong with Project Prevention?
Read More »Embrace the controversy: let’s offer Project Prevention on the NHS
Are We Future Evil Aliens?
By: Julian Savulescu
Stephen Hawking, the Cambridge physicist, has recently argued, in a Discovery channel documentary, that alien life forms probably exist somewhere in the Universe, but we should avoid contact with them. (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8642558.stm). His reason is, apparently, that if they are anything like humans, they are likely to be aggressive and either exterminate us or pillage our resources.
"If aliens visit us, the outcome would be much as when Columbus landed in America, which didn't turn out well for the Native Americans," he said. "We only have to look at ourselves to see how intelligent life might develop into something we wouldn't want to meet."
Upcoming Events in May 2010
25 May, 17:30, Lecture Theatre, Faculty of Philosophy, 10 Merton Street, Oxford
3rd Leverhulme Lecture
"Are Addicts Responsible? Perspectives from Philosophy, Psychology, Neuroscience and Law"
Professor Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (Kenan Institute for Ethics, Duke University)
All interested in attending should email nicholas.iles@philosophy.ox.ac.uk